August 4, 2017

Moving the Car, Part One

Ten summers ago we traveled to Europe.  Such adventures were a much simpler trick in the days before children, mortgages, and half-acre lawns to keep.  Back then my wife and I, along with some friends, enjoyed a very stunted version of the “Grand Tour.”  In less than two weeks we explored parts of London, Paris, Normandy, and Amsterdam before relaxing a few days with our friend’s relatives in Heek, Germany.
            We packed a season’s worth of memories into ten or so days, from navigating the Parisian subway system to shooting a zucchini off the top of a twenty-foot tall ladder during an impromptu, culturally authentic “shutzenfest” in Germany.  One particular memory, however, that didn’t seem all that profound at the time but that has grown in interest as the years have dashed past, took place during our second day in London.
            So there we were, relaxing in a restaurant beneath the London Eye, the city’s iconic giant Ferris wheel.  We were killing time, waiting for our journey to France on the Eurostar, while behind us out in the street, a large tow truck with an actual crane attached to it slowly lifted a car from its parking spot and onto the back of its bed.   Soon both the truck and the car pulled away, leaving the spot empty.
           “Does that happen quite a bit?”  I asked a patron to my right.
           “Sometimes.”  He replied.  “But they’re being a lot more careful since two weeks ago.”
The “two weeks ago” he was referring to at the time was a failed car bombing attempt at an airport in Glasgow.  That day, in fact, July 7th, was the two year anniversary of the London bus bombing that had killed over sixty people.
We were all from small town Illinois, and so such considerations weren’t exactly on the forefront of our concerns, at least not back home.  Throughout the rest of the trip, though, trekking as we were through some of the most densely populated spots on the Continent, we often bumped into such reminders that the world we lived in could be a very dangerous place.
           That was a decade ago, and in the last ten years, I’ve often thought back to that very simple event.  Every time terrible news came out of London, or Paris, or any other place on Earth suffering from yet another sick and violent event, my mind would eventually ask the same question:  Now what?
            Because the fact is, we have had awhile to figure all this out.  We often think back to 9/11 as the turning point in this struggle, and, in many ways, particularly for Americans, it was.
           But terrorism has been around a long time, predating ISIS or Al Qaeda.  The organized use or threat of violence to achieve a political end has been part of the human condition for thousands of years.  Three basic things, however, make modern terrorism much different than what it was in the past.
         The primary change, it seems, is the magnitude of the threat itself.  Terrorists now have the destructive capacity unimagined in previous decades.  Secondly, our civilization itself is more densely populated and our borders more porous, making such violence much more potent.  Finally, our modern media, social and otherwise, inadvertently give terrorists the attention they seek.  
            All these reasons have allowed terrorists to be the bogeyman of our times the way Soviet communists or Nazis were for recent generations, and besides moving your family to a cabin in the woods, sometimes it seems there is little the average citizen can do about it all.  Islamist extremists have throttled their religion in a way that shocks most of us, including the vast majority of Muslims who simply want to live out their lives in peace.
         Before continuing, I want to pause briefly and return to our journey from ten years ago, where one of the highlights was the two relatively peaceful days we spent in Normandy, France.  Far removed from the hustle that characterized much of our trip, we grown up farm kids from Illinois could relax a little in the relatively rural solitude.  We found the beaches of Normandy refreshingly undisturbed; the numerous villages relaxed and friendly. 
            It has occurred to me that Normandy is where America, from a broad historical perspective, at least, shines brightest.  We often gloss over the parts of World War Two that aren’t as heroic—such as the injustice of the Japanese interment or the carnage of Hiroshima—but on the beaches of Normandy, we focus our historical lenses.   This is our nation, we often proclaim, at its very best:  storming a beach, bleeding against an enemy, vanquishing evil one village at a time.
            It might make sense, then, to model other struggles we come against in the same terms.  As I’ve mentioned in previous columns, America is relatively good at war; our history from the beginning has been very much linked to this martial success, and so we’ve developed the habit of simply declaring war on everything we don’t like.  Poverty.  Drugs. 
Terror.
            The problem, of course, is that poverty is still around, more than a half century after President Johnson targeted it in his sights.  Drugs, too, have outlasted every Chief Executive since Nixon and clearly aren’t going anywhere anytime soon.
            Granted, terrorism, because it is by its nature violent, does respond to violence in the short term.  The long term problem, however, with declaring war on terrorism is that this problem affects all of us and most of us don’t see ourselves a soldiers.  We don’t personalize the issue until after the fact; until after the bomb has exploded, until after the gunman has been shot by the police, and even then we move on with our lives unless someone we actually know has been killed.

Any winnable “war on terror” would need to be waged as a total war, by soldiers and civilians alike.  For the sake of brevity, in a few weeks this column will consider what such a struggle would look like by taking a cue from the world of medicine.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts