Two years ago I wrote a
series of columns about the School Facility Sales Tax proposal, which will once
again be on the ballot in Effingham County next month. Like most columns about
taxes, they were infuriating. Taxes make people mad, regardless of what
kind they are, and, considering our history, perhaps these feelings are
understandable. One might argue that this disdain for taxes is in our
cultural DNA, going all the way back to the mid-18th century.
Not all taxes are
created equal, however, and controversial issues often lend themselves to
misinformation. This column, then, will be devoted to hopefully clearing
up some questions about the tax in general, as well as countering some
arguments against it.
Question: How much
is this thing going to cost?
Answer: That’s
impossible to answer without knowing a person’s particular spending habits, but
keep in mind that this is a one PENNY tax on each dollar spent for specific
items. Groceries and medicine—the stuff we need to actually live—are not
taxed. Farm equipment and cars are also not taxed. Dining out is
taxed. Retail merchandise is taxed. Gasoline is taxed. For every
dollar we put into our gas tanks, an extra penny will go to help keep local
school buildings up-to-date. For every dollar we put into our wardrobes,
one penny will go toward giving our students a competitive edge for their
future.
Question: Why
should we help pay for teacher and administrator salaries?
Answer: We’re not; at
least not with this tax. The money generated cannot be spent on salaries
or curriculum; it can only be spent on building-related costs. This covers
a wide range of expenses, from electrical updates to roofing needs, from
wheelchair accessibility to building security.
Question: Why are
we being threatened with higher property taxes if the sales tax proposal fails?
Answer: It might be
easier to answer this question with an analogy from the outdoors. If you
are in a raft going down a river and there is a waterfall fifty yards
downstream, the guy telling you about the waterfall is not threatening you with
a waterfall. If you are floating down a river, you might get wet.
Thus, people who live in
communities with public schools may see their property taxes increased on
occasion to help keep those schools viable, particularly if that same community
exists in a state as sorely governed as ours. That’s not a threat; that’s just
geography. Regardless, the Schools Facility Sales Tax is partially
designed to alleviate the need for an increase in property taxes.
Question: Aren’t we
just financing poor stewardship? Why do these schools need so much upkeep
in the first place?
Answer: Entropy. Everything
in the universe, regardless of how well you maintain it, eventually needs to be
replaced and/or updated. Effingham Junior High School, for example, was
built in 1939; many of our county’s schools are close to the same age. These
schools are testimony to both the craftsmanship put into them originally and
the dedication shown to them over the course of decades. To imagine that a
school district has someone “allowed” these buildings to just “deteriorate” is
both an exaggeration and a bit insulting to the generations of good stewards
who have helped keep the doors open this deep into the 21st century.
Question: Won’t
this tax drive away business?
Answer: That’s a
stretch. Even if this sales tax passes, Effingham County will still have
one of the lowest sales-tax rates in the region. The idea that someone
will drive past Effingham as they travel along I-57 or I-70 so they can save
some pocket change is unlikely.
Question: My
grandkids don’t even attend public school. Why should I help pay for a school
in which I have no vested interest?
Answer: From an ideological
standpoint, one might suggest that helping out your neighbor’s child is simply
our shared ethos put into practice. Pragmatically speaking, however, the
stronger “your” schools are—and I use the possessive pronoun “your” to indicate
any school—public, private, parochial—that exists within the same geographic
region in which you live—the stronger your community will be.
Strong and dynamic
schools act as magnets for dynamic people, drawing them into your community,
keeping them there from one year to the next, from generation to
generation. Dynamic people work hard, they give generously, they create
jobs, and they teach their children to do all those things, too. If that
is the kind of community in which you want to live, then it stands to reason
that you actually do have a vested interest in ALL of the schools in that
community—all of them—from preschool to post-secondary opportunities.
In closing, it has
always confused me why we, as a society, will claim to value our young people
and make vague claims like, “the children are our future,” but then run for the
pitchforks whenever someone talks about providing them with good
schools. What is it about maintaining these buildings, anyway, that makes
some of us so mad?